ISSN 1016-5169 | E-ISSN 1308-4488
pdf
Artificial Intelligence and Guideline-Augmented Prompting in Assessing the Need for Preoperative Cardiology Consultation [Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars]
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. Ahead of Print: TKDA-70041 | DOI: 10.5543/tkda.2025.70041

Artificial Intelligence and Guideline-Augmented Prompting in Assessing the Need for Preoperative Cardiology Consultation

Mehmet Uğur Çalışkan1, Ceren Yağmur Doğru Yılmaz2, Halenur Sarıbaş3, Elmas Kaplan4, Ceren Özdemir Al5, Ertan Andaç Al5
1Department of Cardiology, Kızılcahamam State Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
2Department of Cardiology, Çorum Erol Olçok State Hospital, Çorum, Türkiye
3Department of Cardiology, Ardahan State Hospital, Ardahan, Türkiye
4Department of Cardiology, Çankırı State Hospital, Çankırı, Türkiye
5Department of Cardiology, Nazilli State Hospital, Aydın, Türkiye

Objective: With the growing elderly population worldwide, the number of annual surgical procedures has risen substantially, leading to increase in the demand for preoperative cardiology consultations. In parallel, recent years have witnessed remarkable innovations in cardiology driven by advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the performance of three widely used AI models-ChatGPT-5, Deepseek-V3, and Gemini 2.0 Pro-in assessing the necessity of cardiology consultation in preoperative patients, and to explore the potential contribution of guideline-augmented prompting in this context.
Methods: A council consisting of seven cardiologists and seven anesthesiologists was formed. Each physician evaluated 20 preoperative patient scenarios and provided recommendations on whether a separate cardiology consultation was necessary. For each case, the majority decision of the council was accepted as the reference standard. The same scenarios were presented to three AI models, and their responses were recorded. Subsequently, the AI models with the highest concordance were integrated into the decision framework using guideline-augmented prompting, and the cases were re-evaluated.
Results: Although there was no statistically significant difference, ChatGPT-5 and Gemini 2.0 Pro showed higher concordance than Deepseek-V3 in preoperative consultation decisions (κ=0,706, κ=0,681; 85% accuracy). Following the integration of guidelines into ChatGPT-5 and Gemini 2.0 Pro, the models were re-evaluated and demonstrated improvement in performance (κ=0.898, 95% accuracy).
Conclusion: ChatGPT-5, Deepseek-V3, and Gemini 2.0 Pro demonstrated effectiveness in assessing the necessity of cardiology consultation in preoperatively evaluated patients. Moreover, the integration of guideline-augmented prompting was shown to improve the accuracy and reliability of AI model performance.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, machine learning, preoperative consultation


Corresponding Author: Mehmet Uğur Çalışkan
Manuscript Language: English
×
APA
NLM
AMA
MLA
Chicago
Copied!
CITE


Journal Metrics

Journal Citation Indicator: 0.18
CiteScore: 1.1
Source Normalized Impact
per Paper:
0.22
SCImago Journal Rank: 0.348

Quick Search

Copyright © 2025 Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology



Kare Publishing is a subsidiary of Kare Media.