ISSN 1016-5169  |  E-ISSN 1308-4488
High Thrombus Burden in Premature Type 1 Myocardial Infarction: Cross-Sectional Associations With STEMI Presentation, Coronary Flow, and Systemic Inflammation-Uncorrected Proof [Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars]
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. Ahead of Print: TKDA-94455 | DOI: 10.5543/tkda.2026.94455

High Thrombus Burden in Premature Type 1 Myocardial Infarction: Cross-Sectional Associations With STEMI Presentation, Coronary Flow, and Systemic Inflammation-Uncorrected Proof

Mehmet Zafer Aydın1, Mehmet Kamil Teber1, Zülfiye Kuzu1, Can Baba Arın2
1Department of Cardiology, Kayseri City Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Türkiye
2Department of Cardiology, Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye

Objective: We evaluated whether admission complete blood count-derived inflammatory indices were associated with angiographic high thrombus burden (HTB) in premature myocardial infarction (MI).
Method: Consecutive patients aged <45 years with type 1 MI and an identifiable culprit lesion who underwent coronary angiography between 2020 and 2024 were included in this single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. Thrombus burden was assessed using the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) thrombus grading scale, with occluded vessels reclassified after restoration of coronary flow; HTB was defined as grades 4–5. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) were evaluated using clinically defined multivariable logistic regression models, with and without adjustment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presentation.
Results: Among 137 patients (77 with STEMI and 60 with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]), 81 had an occluded culprit vessel; after restoration of coronary flow, only two lesions remained classified as grade 5. HTB was identified in 79 patients (57.7%) and was associated with STEMI presentation (67.1% vs. 41.4%, P = 0.003) and culprit vessel occlusion (69.6% vs. 44.8%, P = 0.004). Neither NLR (P = 0.54) nor SIRI (P = 0.20) differed significantly between thrombus burden categories, and neither was associated with HTB after adjustment for pre-event characteristics (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94–1.17 and OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.95–1.35, respectively) or additional adjustment for STEMI presentation (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.92–1.14 and OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.90–1.30, respectively), whereas STEMI presentation remained significantly associated with HTB (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.33–5.68, P = 0.006). The findings were consistent across all sensitivity analyses, and discriminatory performance was negligible (areas under the curve of 0.531 and 0.564). No significant differences in in-hospital outcomes were detected; however, these comparisons were underpowered.
Conclusion: In young patients with angiographically confirmed type 1 MI, HTB was associated with STEMI presentation and initial coronary occlusion but not with admission inflammatory indices.

Keywords: Coronary angiography, coronary thrombosis, inflammation, myocardial infarction, ST-elevation myocardial infarction.


Corresponding Author: Mehmet Zafer Aydın
Manuscript Language: English
×
APA
NLM
AMA
MLA
Chicago
Copied!
CITE
LookUs & Online Makale