ISSN 1016-5169 | E-ISSN 1308-4488
pdf
Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Assessing ChatGPT's Knowledge and Clinical Scenario Responses [Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars]
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2025; 53(3): 173-177 | DOI: 10.5543/tkda.2025.57195

Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Assessing ChatGPT's Knowledge and Clinical Scenario Responses

Muhammet Geneş1, Salim Yaşar2, Serdar Fırtına2, Ahmet Faruk Yağcı2, Erkan Yıldırım2, Cem Barçın2, Uygar Çağdaş Yüksel2
1Department of Cardiology, Sincan Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
2Department of Cardiology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye


OBJECTIVE
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves survival, reduces hospital readmissions, and enhances quality of life; however, participation remains low due to barriers related to access, awareness, and socioeconomic factors. This study explores the potential of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically ChatGPT, in supporting CR by providing guideline-aligned recommendations and fostering patient motivation.


METHOD
This cross-sectional study evaluated ChatGPT-4’s responses to 40 questions developed by two cardiologists based on current cardiology guidelines. The questions covered fundamental principles of CR, clinical applications, and real-life scenarios. Responses were categorized based on guideline adherence as fully compliant, partially compliant, compliant but insufficient, or non-compliant. Two expert evaluators assessed the responses, and inter-rater reliability was analyzed using Cohen’s kappa coefficient.


RESULTS
ChatGPT provided responses to all 40 questions. Among the 20 general open-ended questions, 14 were rated as fully compliant, while six were compliant but insufficient. Of the 20 clinical scenario-based questions, 16 were fully compliant, and four were compliant but insufficient. ChatGPT demonstrated strengths in areas such as risk stratification and patient safety strategies, but limitations were noted in managing elderly patients and high-intensity interval training. Inter-rater reliability was calculated as 90% using Cohen’s kappa coefficient.


CONCLUSION
ChatGPT shows promise as a complementary decision-support tool in CR by providing guideline-compliant information. However, limitations in contextual understanding and lack of real-world validation restrict its independent clinical use. Future improvements should focus on personalization, clinical validation, and integration with healthcare professionals.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence, cardiac rehabilitation, ChatGPT, clinical decision support, digital health

Corresponding Author: Muhammet Geneş
Manuscript Language: English
×
APA
NLM
AMA
MLA
Chicago
Copied!
CITE


Journal Metrics

Journal Citation Indicator: 0.18
CiteScore: 1.1
Source Normalized Impact
per Paper:
0.22
SCImago Journal Rank: 0.348

Quick Search

Copyright © 2025 Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology



Kare Publishing is a subsidiary of Kare Media.