ISSN 1016-5169 | E-ISSN 1308-4488
pdf
Perspectives on the Use of Digital Health Technologies in Cardiology Among Specialists from an ESC Member Country: Results from a Survey [Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars]
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2024; 52(1): 44-51 | DOI: 10.5543/tkda.2023.13660

Perspectives on the Use of Digital Health Technologies in Cardiology Among Specialists from an ESC Member Country: Results from a Survey

Duygu Koçyigit Burunkaya1, Nurgül Keser2, Evrim Şimşek3, Serdar Bozyel4, Yalçın Dalgıç4, Mehmet Şeker2, Yetkin Korkmaz2, Arda Güler5, Tufan Çınar2, Mehmet Ertürk5
1Guven Health Group, Ankara, Türkiye
2Department of Cardiology, Health Sciences University Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
3Department of Cardiology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Türkiye
4Department of Cardiology, Health Sciences University Derince Training and Research Hospital, Kocaeli, Türkiye
5Department of Cardiology, Health Sciences University Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye


OBJECTIVE
In this study, we aimed to identify the reasons for and perceived challenges associated with the use of digital health technologies (DHT) in cardiology.


METHOD
We distributed an online survey to Turkish Society of Cardiology member cardiologists (n = 2789) between January 10 and March 3, 2022.


RESULTS
A total of 308 subjects responded (27.6% females, 62.0% aged 30-44 years). Of these, 42.5% worked at university hospitals, and 44.8% at state hospitals. Smart devices were used by 44.2% (136/308) for personal health monitoring. Additionally, 40.3% (117/290) used social media to provide medical information to patients, while 64.6% (193/299) did so for communication with other physicians. The self-reported recommendation frequencies of wearables, cardiac implantable electronic device telemonitorization, mobile health applications, and teleconsultation/televisit technologies were lower than the proportion of respondents who found DHT beneficial for both patients and physicians. The most frequently mentioned barriers for physicians were increased work burden and responsibilities (78.8%, 193/245), lack of financial compensation (66.9%, 164/245), and lack of relevant training (66.5%, 163/245). For patients, low technological adaptability (81.6%, 200/245), low health literacy (80.4%, 197/245), and low affordability (79.6%, 195/245) were the most frequently mentioned barriers. Additionally, the cost of technologies (69.4%, 170/245), concerns regarding data privacy and security (57.6%, 141/245), and data storage challenges (48.2%, 118/245) were the most significant technical impediments.


CONCLUSION
The findings suggest that although the majority of physicians believe DHT to be beneficial for both themselves and their patients, the frequency of recommendations to patients remains low. A large-scale joint effort is required to address these issues and facilitate the integration of DHT into clinical practice.

Keywords: Digital health and telemedicine, mobile technologies, social media, remote monitoring, barriers

Corresponding Author: Duygu Koçyigit Burunkaya, Türkiye
Manuscript Language: English
×
APA
NLM
AMA
MLA
Chicago
Copied!
CITE


Journal Metrics

Journal Citation Indicator: 0.18
CiteScore: 1.1
Source Normalized Impact
per Paper:
0.22
SCImago Journal Rank: 0.348

Quick Search

Copyright © 2024 Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology



Kare Publishing is a subsidiary of Kare Media.